Not all
areas, of children’s development, are easily measurable by testing and
assessment. Children who are shy, withdrawn, experiencing difficulties at home
because of poverty, abuse or neglect or they simply do not test well. There are other factors such as the level of
development of each child. No two children
develop at the same rate during their early years and some are in need of more
individual instruction than others are. We
must consider each of these issues when looking at the whole child and not just,
what we learn from assessments.
Most states
and countries assess school age children using standardized testing. The problem
that I have always had with standardized testing is that although it gives
measurable data regarding the skills and knowledge of children, it uses the
same measurements to determine children’s level of learning. In parts of the UK and France, Norway and
Japan, according to Hall & Ozerk, (2008), they seek to monitor the quality
of learning of their pupils at national level through assessment of pupil
achievement against national norms or competencies within specified subjects
and their assessments are both criterion- and curriculum-referenced. Hall and Ozerk, (2008 pg. 15), also
determined that what distinguishes the assessment policy in England as compared
to other countries is the degree to which it is used as a tool, a) to control
what is taught; b) to police how well it is taught; and c) to encourage parents
to use the resultant assessment information to select schools for their children.
The use of
assessments in measuring children’s abilities can be a positive and useful tool
but should not be the only determining factor.
In order to know what goals and objective to use in planning and preparing
for children individually, we must consider other outside factors that could
have either a direct or indirect affect on the child’s ability to learn. Another important factor to consider is
whether the tool chosen is age appropriate and whether it is reliable in what
you seek to measure.
Reference:
Hall, K., & Ozerk, K. (2008). Primary
curriculum and assessment: England and
other
countries. Primary Review Research
Survey. University of Cambridge: Cambridge, CB2 8PQ, U.K.
I agree that all testing should be age appropriate and should not be the determining factor. It's time for educators to come up with a way to measure results differently. I'm not in the classroom but I do know that there is a lot of pressures on teachers to have children pass these standardized tests. Many of the teachers that I've spoken with all stated that they dislike standardized testing. Do teachers have a say in the way they feel children should be tested?
ReplyDeleteHi Liz,
ReplyDeleteI also agree that testing should be revamped and while at it given different objectives that the children must meet accordng to their own abilities and limitations. I really don't think it's fair that all children have to be tested the same, even those from different cultures who may not even be familiar with the materials.